Descubrí

A los 10 años descubrí que tenía mucho qué aprender.
A los 15 años descubrí que podía aprender mucho.
A los 20 años descubrí lo que debía aprender.
A los 30 años descubrí que debía olvidar mucho de lo que había aprendido.
A los 40 años descubrí que había olvidado aprender muchas cosas.
A los 50 años descubrí que hay que aprender a olvidar algunas cosas.
A los 60 años descubrí que no había aprendido mucho que debí aprender, y que no había olvidado mucho que debí olvidar.
Y a los 70 años descubrí que tengo mucho qué aprender.

Nuestros hábitos: Somos lo que hacemos y lo que pensamos

La historia:

Para llevar a cabo un experimento, un grupo de científicos pusieron 5 monos dentro de una jaula al centro de la cual ubicaron una larga escalera en cuya punta colgaron una enorme penca de apetitosos plátanos.

Cada vez que alguno de los monos comenzaba a subir la escalera para alcanzar las bananas, los científicos vertían agua helada sobre los animales que permanecían debajo. Después de algún tiempo, los monos que permanecían debajo adoptaron un nuevo comportamiento: cada vez que alguno de ellos hacía un intento por subir a la escalera, los demás lo sujetaban o evitaban que subiera mediante métodos violentos. En cierto momento, los monos dejaron de intentar subir la escalera, a pesar del fuerte atractivo de los plátanos en la punta de la misma.

Los científicos entonces reemplazaron a uno de los monos que había estado en la jaula; lo primero que intentó el mono fue alcanzar los plátanos en la escalera. Un buen intento que fue rápida, determinada y violentamente frustrado por los demás monos. Después de un buen número de esfuerzos dolorosamente reprimidos, el nuevo mono en el grupo cesó sus intentos.

Los científicos trajeron entonces a un segundo mono de reemplazo quien también hizo esfuerzos por llegar a la punta de la escalera. Esta ocasión, el substituto inicial se unió entusiastamente a la violencia para impedirlo. El mismo ritual fue repetido con el tercero, el cuarto y el quinto mono de reemplazo hasta que no quedó ninguno de los animales del grupo original en la jaula.

Finalmente, los científicos se quedaron con cinco monos que a pesar de no haber tenido la experiencia del tratamiento de agua helada, continuaron atacando a cualesquier otro mono que intentó alcanzar los plátanos.

La necesidad:
Esta breve historia pretende hacernos comprender el valor de cuestionar y tal vez ”destrozar” nuestros hábitos.

Por ejemplo:
1. Es nuestra manera de pensar la consecuencia de un hábito?
2. Porqué un gran avance generalmente es precedido por un cambio en nuestros hábitos?
3. Cuáles de sus hábitos están frenando su avance, a pesar de que se sienta cómodo con él?
4. De qué hábito desearía desprenderse?
5. Cuáles de sus hábitos son consecuencia de un castigo o represión que desapareció ya hace tiempo pero que usted continúa ejerciendo, como los monos de la historia?

El qué hacer:
Los hábitos son como un viejo sweater con el que nos sentimos cómodos. Les tenemos afecto por lo que significan para nosotros: una memoria, un recuerdo, un castigo, o tal vez en algún momento fueron un buen estímulo o recompensa después de hacer algo en lo que tuvimos mucho éxito.

El problema es que como un viejo sweater, probablemente ya no lucen tan bien como cuando eran nuevos, o ya no nos quedan tan bien como para andarlos presumiendo. Nuestra evolución natural como personas nos obliga a desprendernos de aquellos hábitos que ya no nos quedan por status, posición jerárquica, o etapa de vida. El desafío es identificarlos, y atacarlos con vehemencia y dedicación. Deshacernos del sweater. Quemarlo, para que ya no lo pueda utilizar.

El cómo hacerlo:
Una forma sencilla de intentarlo es simplemente dejar de hacer siempre lo mismo y/o enfocar las cosas de manera diferente cada día. Por ejemplo, cambiar de mano para rasurarse o peinarse. Tomar una ruta diferente hacia el trabajo. Usar una nueva frase para saludar a los demás. Dejar de responder de manera automática a las preguntas típicas. Acomodar el escritorio o la ropa de otra manera.

En fin. Usted seguramente ya tiene clara la idea. Dejar de repetir. Hacer algo nuevo. Hablar de otra manera. Pensar de manera diferente. Sencillo? Tal vez. Lo importante es intentarlo.

Para apoyar estas últimas ideas les dejo una frase de un muy ilustre pensador:

“Nosotros somos lo que hacemos repetidamente”
Aristóteles

Y usted, ya empezó a romper sus hábitos?

Watching the Brain Learn

How do people learn complex new skills, such as juggling and reading?

By R. Douglas Fields   

 
 



Practice makes perfect, but how? Two groups of neuroscientists using MRI brain imaging announced last month that they were able to see changes inside the brains of people after mastering a new skill.  The big surprise is that the part of the brain that changed has no neurons or synapses in it!  The cerebral remodeling during learning was seen in the mysterious and still largely unexplored “white matter” region of the brain.

“Grey matter” is synonymous with smarts, but in fact only half of the human brain is grey matter.  White matter, the “other brain tissue”, is rarely mentioned.   Neurons in the cerebral cortex are packed into in the top layers of the brain, where they are connected together through synapses.  Learning takes place in the grey matter by linking neurons together into new circuits by strengthening synapses or forming new ones.

But beneath the topsoil of the brain lies a dense network of fibers packed into a spaghetti-like snarl that is so complicated it is difficult to study or comprehend.   These fibers are the wire-like axons projecting out from neurons in grey matter that transmit electrical impulses.  Like buried telephone lines, these tightly bundled cables transmit information over long distances to communicate between distant regions of the cerebral cortex that are specialized to carry out different aspects of a complex cognitive function.  

To understand the importance of white matter, consider what is happening under the baseball cap of a left fielder leaping over the wall to snatch a baseball in mid air.  Visual processing in the back of his brain perceives and tracks the flying object and at the same time it monitors all the other objects on the field as the athlete runs to catch the ball.  Then the motor control centers in the parietal region of his brain engage to launch his body on a running trajectory to intercept the projectile.  Finally, precisely timed fine motor control extends his arm into space with millimeter precision to clench fingers at the right instant to pluck the speeding ball out of the sky.  All the while the player simultaneously perceives the fluid situation on the field as runners advance and strategies unfold so that he can make critical split-second decisions—”Do I hold the ball or hurl it to home plate?”  This higher level decision making is calculated in the frontal lobes, just behind the eye brows.  All this vital communication sweeps across the entire brain from the back of the skull to the front to activate different regions of cerebral cortex specialized in executing individual aspects of the skill. 

That’s the job of white matter—long distant speedy communication.  The tissue is white because many axons are coated with tightly wrapped layers of electrical insulation called myelin.  This insulation, made by non-neuronal cells (called oligodendrocytes), speeds the transmission of electrical impulses 100 times faster than transmission rates through bare axons.  The complex skill of catching a baseball is a far cry from Pavlov and his slobbering dog learning to associate the sound of a bell with food.  Skill learning is likely to involve different mechanisms.  The kind of complex learning involved in mastering new skills such as catching a fly ball, takes time to learn and repetition over the course of days,weeks or years.  This type of learning is what these neuroscientists dared to tackle.

In the first study,  Jan Scholz and colleagues at the University of Oxford, England, used MRI brain imaging to obtain a detailed scan of the brain of 48 right-handed adults.  Then they taught half of them to juggle.  Anyone who has tried to master the three-ball-toss knows how difficult juggling is and how much practice it takes to learn it.  But as in learning to ride a bike, once the complicated skill is mastered, suddenly everything “clicks” and the process becomes mysteriously automatic.  Learning to read is like that too, which is what the second research group investigated, but first let’s have a look at the fascinating study peering into the brain of jugglers. 

Six weeks after training, the jugglers had their brains re-scanned, as did the other half of the group who were not taught to juggle.  The untrained individuals comprise the vital experimental control group, which allows researchers to check whether any brain changes they find in the jugglers might have happened by chance.  What the researchers found is that the structure of white matter in the region beneath the cortical area known to handle visuo-motor processing became more highly organized after learning to juggle (the right posterior intraparietal sulcus, IPS).  A third MRI taken a month later without any further training showed that the changes in the white matter in this area of the juggler’s brain were still evident.

The study’s lead author, a juggler herself, was not too surprised to see changes in this part of the brain, “It is an area of visuo-motor integration, which is an essential aspect of learning to juggle,” she told me.  “The IPS is quite important for the co-ordination of quick and precise arm and grasping movements with the visual tracking of the juggling balls.”  But the big surprise was to find that the white matter regions in this part of the brain had changed at all.  Not unexpectedly, changes were seen in the grey matter above these white matter fibers, but the grey matter changes seemed to be independent of the white matter changes.  “The white matter changes seemed to be primarily training or activity related.  In contrast, once triggered, the grey matter changes seem to continue even after 4 weeks of training abstinence, suggesting a more sluggish underlying mechanism.”  Changes in dendrites or vascular supply could have caused the grey matter changes, but what about the white matter? 

The brain imaging cannot tell us exactly what has changed at a cellular level in white matter after learning to juggle.  The technology, called diffusion tensor imaging, is sensitive to how uniformly water diffuses between the fibers in white matter.   The larger the fiber diameters and the more densely packed axons are, or the more thickly wrapped with myelin insulation, the better water flows along the fibers than in all directions.  Just as paint will flow up the bristles of a paint brush, but stains diffuse symmetrically through the fibers of a carpet because they are less organized, the microstructure of these white matter tracts carrying signals coordinating vision and hand motion became more organized after learning to juggle. 

Since none of the jugglers were willing to donate their brains to science, we can only wonder what has changed on a cellular level in their white matter tracts as they learned the new skill.  Research on experimental animals shows that experience can increase myelin formation, and recently research has shown that impulse activity in axons is communicated to the myelin forming oligodendrocytes, stimulating them to form more myelin.  This is what the researchers would be most excited to learn, because changes in myelin during learning would affect the speed of information transmission through neural circuits, and optimizing the speed and synchrony of nervous signals transmitted between the distant cortical regions could in theory explain part of the process that enables us to learn new complex skills. 

Another difficult but very important skill for everyone to master is learning to read.  Brain imaging has detected differences in certain white matter tracts in the brains of people with dyslexia, and differences in white matter have been observed in children with different reading abilities, but this does not necessarily mean that learning to read changes white matter.  These differences could be individual differences or related to a large number of other changes taking place in the brain of children as they mature.  To test this hypothesis, one would need a population of adults who were never taught to read, and then after giving them reading lessons, scan their brain for any changes.  But where would you find such a population of illiterate adults?

Dr. Manuel Carreiras and colleagues at the Bosque Center of Cognition Brain and Language in Spain, told me he stumbled upon the perfect set of experimental subjects by chance.  “I was looking for illiterates and they were very difficult to find in Spain.  One of my doctoral students was from Colombia, so I asked her.”  She related the troubled history of guerrilla warriors in her country who were now being re-integrating into mainstream society and learning to read for the first time as adults.  “So I asked her whether it would be possible to get them in Bogota, where we could find an MRI machine.” 

The brain scan gave the answer as clear as a picture.  The splenium of the corpus callosum was bigger in the guerrilla warriors who had completed the reading lessons.  The corpus callosum is the large bundle of fibers that connects the left and right sides of our brain together.  This was just the spot that previous research had found was sometimes underdeveloped in people with dyslexia. 

A remarkable contribution of this study is that this is a snapshot of brain structure, not a DTI measure of water diffusion.  Carrieras and colleagues also did DTI and functional brain imaging, which backed up their findings with structural MRI.  Since the fibers in the splenium of the corpus callosum are laid down during embryonic development, the increased bulk of white matter in this pathway must have developed during the process of learning to read as an adult.  Again, we can’t say exactly what has changed on a cellular level in rewiring the brain during reading, but Dr. Carreiras also suspects increased myelin could be involved. 

This raises some interesting new leads for helping children with dyslexia.  Most children with dyslexia struggle with reading, but eventually most do learn to read, and some become quite proficient in reading and writing later in life.  Their biggest problem, many argue, is a rigid school system that cannot adapt to the fact that there are great individual differences in the way everyone’s brain is wired, and this affects the way and the rate of learning different kinds of skills, such as reading and mathematics.  Because this study shows that this white matter region vital for reading changed in the process of learning to read, this casts a new light on the large body of literature that had documented differences in dyslexic brains.  “This new study therefore suggests that some of the differences seen in dyslexia may be a consequence of reading difficulties rather than a cause,” Carreiras told me.  This new insight also offers a hopeful outlook for people with dyslexia because it suggests the possibility that dyslexics could (or perhaps they do) modify these pathways through experience as they eventually learn to cope with the reading difficulty.  “This is precisely one of the questions we are addressing,” he shared with me in explaining his plans for a large project on dyslexia in Spain. 

Discovering changes in white matter turns traditional concepts of cellular learning on its head, because these are modifications of the output of neurons rather than changing the synaptic input.  Historically myelin was of no interest to neuroscientists working to understand how the brain learns.   Myelin was thought to be static, a structural element that was laid down on axons during development, but the insulation never changed unless it was damaged or diseased, as in multiple sclerosis.   These old assumptions are now being re-examined.

It’s now clear that we will never fully understand the mechanism of learning if all attention is focused only on what happens at tiny synapses and we fail to consider the efficiency of information flow through the global system of networks in the brain.  By analogy, neuroscientists have broadened their scope of investigation from the transistor to the internet.  Following this cerebral information highway is leading us on a fascinating road into the future.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)
R. Douglas Fields is the Chief of the Section on Nervous System Development and Plasticity at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Learn more about his forthcoming book, “The Other Brain,” at www.theotherbrainbook.com

The Power of a Good Story

Posted by Jill • Thursday, 8-April-2010

Telling stories, other than those that are tall, has long been used as a compelling way to convey content that sticks.  We remember stories.  Stories stir our emotions, engage our senses and activate our imaginations.  We learn from stories – the best stories have a moral or punctuation point that has us metaphorically smacking our foreheads and going A-ha!  Now I get it!  Stories and listening have long held hands – if nobody’s listening, what’s the point of telling the story?

One of my favorite stories is an illustrative, lesson-learning, emotional sucker punch story.  It starts with a man going on a journey.  He’s sold up everything he has to pay for the passage.  He boards the ship with all he owns in one small bag, and settles himself in his humble steerage quarters.  Over the course of the ships journey – several weeks – he sustains himself on dry biscuits and water.   You see, he has no money to buy food.  By the end of the journey, he’s weak in spirit and body as he packs his small bag and prepares to leave the ship.  The ship’s captain stands on deck to farewell each passenger.  As the young man shakes the captain’s hand, he looks into his eyes.  In that small moment, the captain is compelled to speak for a moment to him.  He asks “Young man how is it that we never had the pleasure of your company at dinner during your voyage?”  The young man replied “well, sir, I didn’t have the means to purchase any food on the journey.  I spent everything I had in the world on the fare”.  The captain’s heart is heavy and full and his voice is thick with meaning as he replies “Young man, did you not know that all meals were included in the fare?”

The point of the story is that for so many of us, we do not know what is included in our fare.  We limit ourselves to dry bread and water, when a fresh and sumptuous buffet is there’s for us to partake of.  We live life small.

When we use stories, we ask our conversation partners to listen at a different level.  When we tell stories, we give our interlocutor choices that no other format provides.  There’s virtually nothing that a good story will not do. 

There’s been a movement in the last few years to bring storytelling into the corporate world.  Stories are used in everything from uncovering the corporate culture, diagnosis and discovery, through to corporate branding.  One Australian company on the leading of corporate story is Anecdote.   My respected friend Shawn Callahan is one of the architects of bringing stories and storytelling into the corporate world.  Anecdote not only helps people in corporate tell better stories, but helps them listen to them as well.  Story Listening is a strategy to help those on the receiving end of stories make meaning out of what they hear. And not just any meaning, but meaning that sticks.

Noel Tychy in his leadership coaching book The Leadership Engine
refers to winning leaders as “portraying the future as an unfolding drama” by telling stories that weave together ideas, values and modes of behavior.  None of that is possible without listening – how do you hear those ideas?  Tune into those values?  Affect those modes of behavior?  These things are impossible unless there is effective, two-way listening.

We know the power of stories.  How can you use stories more to help others listen better?  To listen more deeply.  More meaningfully.  To remember more of what is said. 

Creatividad Unica

Esto parece una imagen normal de agricultores japoneses, en una plantación de arroz normal.

Pero a medida que se desplaza hacia abajo, emerge un cuadro cuando el arroz crece.

Hacia la parte inferior, las imágenes están subtituladas con una explicación de este arte único.

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Es impresionante el arte de los cultivos que ha surgido a través de los campos de arroz en Japón, pero esto no es una creación extraterrestre. Los diseños han sido hábilmente sembrados.

Para la creación de las imágenes, los agricultores no usan tinta.

En cambio, utilizan las plantas de arroz de color diferentes, que han sido estratégicamente dispuestas y cultivadas en los campos de arroz.

Cuando avanza el verano y las plantas crecen, las ilustraciones detalladas comienzan a emerger.

 
 

Un guerrero Sengoku a caballo ha sido creado a partir de cientos de miles de plantas de arroz.

Los colores son creados por el uso de variedades diferentes. Esta foto fue tomada en Inakadate, Japón.

Napoleón a caballo puede ser visto desde el cielo. ha sido plantado con precisión y planeado durante meses por los granjeros de esta localidad.

Un personaje de ficción, el guerrero y su mujer, cuyas vidas forman parte de series de televisión.

Este año, varias obras de arte han aparecido en el arroz de otras zonas agrícolas de Japón, como la imagen de Doraemon y los ciervos bailarines.

Los agricultores crean los murales de la siembra utilizando el arroz un poco morado y amarillo Kodaimai junto con sus hojas verde del local Tsugaru-hojas, una variedad romana, para crear los patrones de color en el tiempo entre la siembra y la cosecha en septiembre.

Desde el nivel del suelo, los diseños son invisibles, y los espectadores tienen que subir a la torre del castillo de la aldea para obtener una visión de la obra.

Acercando la imagen, la colocación cuidadosa de los miles de plantas de arroz en los arrozales pueden ser vistos.

Este arte se inició en 1993 como un proyecto de revitalización local, una idea que surgió de las reuniones de los comités de aldea.

Las diferentes variedades de plantas de arroz crecen junto a las otras para crear obras maestras.

En los primeros nueve años, los trabajadores de las aldeas y agricultores locales ampliaron un diseño simple del Monte Iwaki cada año. Pero sus ideas se fueron haciendo más complicadas y atrajo más la atención.

En 2005, los acuerdos entre los propietarios de tierras permitió la creación de enormes espacios de arte con plantas de arroz. Un año más tarde, los organizadores empezaron a utilizar computadoras para diseñar con precisión cada parcela de plantación de las cuatro variedades de arroz de diferentes colores que llevan las imágenes de la vida.

Something to say?

Wise men talk because they have something to say.
Fools talk because they have to say something.
Plato

Tenemos algo que decir?

Los hombres sabios hablan porque tienen algo que decir.
Los tontos hablan porque tienen que decir algo.

Platón

Violencia

“Para que la violencia termine, nunca debe empezar”

Anónimo

Capacidad, Motivacion y Actitud

La capacidad consiste en lo que eres capaz de hacer.
La motivacion determina lo que haces.
La actitud determina que tan bien lo haces.

Lou Holtz.

Que es la Demagogia?

La definición que la Academia da de la palabra «demagogia» es breve y eficaz: «Práctica política consistente en ganarse con halagos el favor popular». Los mexicanos podríamos añadir: «Usase en México para calmar la indignación del pueblo».
Catón-Diario Reforma

Seguir

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.